A Novel Approach to the Arrangement of Islamic Philosophical Problems According to the Model of the Four Intellectual Journeys and Its Extensive and Profound Impacts in Terms of Research and Education

Document Type : Biannual Journal

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Culture and Civilization, Imam Sadiq University

Abstract
Abstract
Research Problem: This article does not aim to explain or justify the arrangement of topics in the book al-Asfār al-Arbaʿa or to force it into conformity with the logic of the four journeys; rather, through an independent study, after identifying the methodological considerations of the mode of the four journeys (al-asfār al-arbaʿa) and demonstrating its efficiency in the domain of rational cognition of phenomena, it endeavors to innovatively situate the principal topics of Islamic philosophy within this framework in a fresh manner. Method: Signification inquiry. Findings: In this redesign, we are not merely dealing with a formal change; rather, in numerous instances, important innovations in the presentation of philosophical issues arise in accordance with the logic of the Four Journeys. Such substantive changes encompass special attention to the duality of “the direction of the Truth” and “the direction of the creation,” along with pursuing its multiple implications in philosophical issues—including the issue of the primacy of existence (asālat al-wujūd)—drawing on the potential of the narrative of the Fall, the problem of evil, and the reality of the material world, as well as attention to social ontology and pursuing its multiple implications, and a clearer linkage between theoretical and practical philosophy. Furthermore, in this scheme, the journey-like order of topics makes the attractiveness, efficiency, and ease of transmitting philosophical teachings more feasible from an educational perspective. Conclusion: The model of the Four Journeys offers a novel and efficient framework for presenting philosophical issues that, in addition to its appeal and educational advantages, also leads, in terms of its content, to much greater development and actualization of the potentials of Islamic philosophy in analyzing ontological issues.
Keywords: The Four Journeys, al-Asfār al-Arbaʿa, Mullā Ṣadrā, ontology, system of issues in Islamic philosophy, teaching philosophy.
 
 
 
Introduction
In an era when dozens of modern and postmodern philosophical schools, with their diverse attractions, influence not only elites but also public opinion, efforts to preserve and sustain the social life of the Islamic philosophical heritage require attention to modern demands. Among these, the structure and organization of philosophical issues sometimes necessitate changes, given the needs and requirements of the time. Moreover, regardless of such requirements, creativity in redesigning the system and format for presenting philosophical problems is itself one of the causes of growth and dynamism in Islamic philosophy; indeed, one of the foremost characteristics of the great Islamic philosophers is their innovation in precisely this area. In this context, Mullā Ṣadrā, in composing his most important philosophical work, proposed a completely innovative and interesting format, and inspired by the mystical model of the four journeys, spoke of the four intellectual journeys and the arrangement of philosophical topics within that framework. Yet in reality, this idea has not received sufficient attention—neither from Mullā Ṣadrā nor from his commentators. This is despite the fact that, in my doctoral dissertation and two other peer-reviewed articles, I have demonstrated in detail that the mystical model of the Four Journeys goes beyond a merely ascetic/sufi framework: it is a highly precise, clear, comprehensive, logical, efficient, and era-appropriate cognitive model, and exploiting its methodological potentials for understanding various phenomena can be highly fruitful.
However, before employing this pattern as a means of understanding other phenomena, it is fitting—in order to complete Mullā Ṣadrā’s idea—to actualize the capacities of this pattern by reconfiguring and reorganizing philosophical discussions. Accordingly, the main question of this article is to provide a methodical account of the significant formal and substantive transformations that occur when the model of the Four Journeys is taken seriously and efforts are made to maximize its use in the presentation and teaching of philosophical topics.
Materials and Methods
The method of this research is signification inquiry. This method, inspired by the article “Methodology of Signification Inquiry in Social and Human Sciences: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches, and Stages of Implementation” by Dr. Hassan Danaeifard, seeks to apply the fundamental concepts and theories of one discipline to research topics in other domains. Specifically, in this article, the mystical-spiritual implications of the Four Journeys model have been utilized to delineate and reconstruct the stages of philosophical thinking in Islamic philosophy.
Discussion and Results
The logic of the first journey consists of purifying and distilling the subject from all extraneous elements. With this consideration, if the subject of philosophy is “being qua being,” then the first journey must involve purifying the truth of existence from all extraneous elements. From this perspective, one can very attractively and innovatively locate major sections of the history of philosophical thought within the first journey.
In the second journey, the wayfarer, by passing through the veil of created determinations (taʿayyunāt-i khalqī), becomes immersed in the direction of the Truth and the direction of creation. Accordingly, explaining the second journey in philosophy depends on understanding a duality known as the “the direction of truth and the direction of creation.” Unlike in mysticism, this duality has not received attention among the conventional philosophical dualities. Efforts to provide a philosophical explanation of it and to pursue its implications within the system of philosophical discussions can lead to profound transformations.
The third journey is the appointed time for returning to the abode of created multiplicities, but not a regressive return; rather, it is a return aimed at uniting the true direction and the created direction. Now, from the perspective of ontological issues as well, this stage is the turn for the ontological analysis of the manner of creation and the levels of origination.
According to the logic of the Four Journeys, after the wayfarer’s knowledge is perfected in the previous three journeys, the time arrives for guiding and assisting others. By the same token, the fourth journey in ontology should be devoted to practical wisdom and the pursuit of the normative implications of theoretical wisdom in the domain of individual and social human action.
Conclusion
The article concludes by offering a novel system for the presentation and teaching of Islamic philosophical wisdom. In this redesign, we were not merely confronted with a single formal or superficial change; rather, in numerous places, significant innovations in the formulation of philosophical issues emerged in accordance with the logic of the Four Journeys. Special attention to the duality of “the direction of the Truth and the direction of creation” and the pursuit of its multiple implications in the formulation of philosophical issues—including the issue of the primacy of existence, drawing on the capacities of the narrative of the Fall in analyzing the arc of descent, the problem of evils, the nature of matter, as well as attention to social ontology and the pursuit of its numerous implications in examining the arc of ascent of creation, and a clearer linkage between theoretical and practical wisdom—were among these substantive changes.

Keywords

Subjects

Ibn Torkeh, Saʾin al-Din. (1360 [1981]). Tamhid al-Qawaʿid. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education Publications. [in Arabic]
Ibn Sina. (1404 AH). Al-Ilahiyyat min al-Shifaʾ. Qom: Ayatollah Marʿashi Publications. [in Arabic]
Ibn ʿArabi, Muhyi al-Din. (1994). Al-Futuhat al-Makkiyya. Beirut: Dar Ihyaʾ al-Turath al-ʿArabi. [in Arabic]
Imam Khomeini. (1381 [2002]). Taqrirat-e Falsafeh, Vol. 3. Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works. [in Persian]
Akbari, Reza. (1384 [2005]). “A Critique and Review of the Philosophy Education System in Iranian Universities.” Naqd va Nazar, No. 37, pp. 321–327. [in Persian]
Izutsu, Toshihiko. (1360 [1981]). The Foundations of Sabzavari’s Philosophy. Tehran: McGill University Institute of Islamic Studies. [in Persian]
Ashtiyani, Mehdi. (1390 [2011]). Glosses on the Commentary of Sabzavari’s Manzuma. Qom: Allameh Ashtiyani Congress. [in Persian]
Parsania, Hamid. (1389 [2010]). Being and Descent. Qom: Daftar-e Nashr-e Maʿaref. [in Persian]
Parsania, Hamid. (1391 [2012]). Social Worlds. Qom: Ketab-e Farda Publications. [in Persian]
Parsania, Hamid. (1395 [2016]). Ethics and Mysticism. Qom: Ketab-e Farda. [in Persian]
Jami, ʿAbd al-Rahman. (n.d.). Three Treatises on Mysticism. Tehran: Manouchehri Library. [in Arabic]
Javadi Amoli, ʿAbdollah. (1386 [2007]). Rahiq-e Makhtum. Qom: Esra Publishing Center. [in Persian]
Al-Jili, ʿAbd al-Karim. (1418 AH). Al-Insan al-Kamil fi Maʿrifat al-Awaʾil wa al-Awakhir. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub. [in Arabic]
Hasanzadeh, Davoud. (1391 [2012]). Analysis of the Four Journeys and Their Foundations in Islamic Mysticism (MA thesis). Qom: Imam Khomeini Institute. [in Persian]
Hasanzadeh, Rahim. (1393 [2014]). An Analysis of God’s Knowledge of His Essence: A Comparative Study of the Views of Mulla Sadra and Jili (MA thesis). Tehran: Imam Sadeq University. [in Persian]
Hasanzadeh Amoli, Hasan. (1378 [1999]). Mumadd al-Himam fi Sharh Fusūs al-Hikam. Tehran: Ministry of Islamic Guidance. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1395 [2016]). Transcendent Sociology: An Ontology of Social Lives Based on Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim; Sadeqi, Majid; Emami Jomʿeh, Mehdi. (1397a [2018]). “An Examination of the Logic of Mulla Sadra’s Four Journeys and Its Application as a Comprehensive and Novel Model for Explaining the Stages of Rational Thought.” Kheradnameh-ye Sadra, Spring 1397, No. 91. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1397b [2018]). Re-reading the Foundations and Structure of Ontological Problems in Transcendent Philosophy Based on the Logic of the Mystical Four Journeys According to Qaysari’s Interpretation (PhD dissertation). Isfahan: University of Isfahan. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1400 [2021]). Companion of Husayn: A New Analysis of Ashura Rituals Based on the Model of the Four Journeys. Tehran: Nashr-e Maʿaref. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1401 [2022]). “A New Demonstration of the Primacy of Society Based on the Rule of Mystical Annihilation in Allameh Tabatabaʾi’s Thought.” Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers (University of Tehran), Spring 1401, No. 24. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1402a [2023]). “The Ontology of Social Lives: A Missing Link in the System of Islamic Philosophical Discussions.” Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers (University of Tehran), Autumn 1402, No. 30. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1402b [2023]). “From Sadrian Psychology to Sadrian Social Philosophy: On the Necessity and Advantages of Using the Model of Philosophical Anthropology for Laying the Groundwork of Islamic Social Science.” Journal of Fundamental Research in the Humanities, Summer 1402, No. 31. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1402c [2023]). “A Critical Account of the Problem of the Primacy of Existence and Its New Placement within the System of Philosophical Principles.” Journal of Philosophical Teachings (Razavi University), Autumn 1402, No. 33. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1402d [2023]). “Re-reading the Foundations and Implications of ‘Social Mysticism’ Based on the Logic of the Mystical Four Journeys.” Islam and Social Sciences, Spring–Summer 1402, No. 29. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1402l [2023]). “From Semantics to the Ontology of Civilization Based on the Anthropological Model of Islamic Philosophy.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Civilizational Studies of the Islamic Revolution, Summer 1402, No. 6. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1404a [2025]). “A New Explanation of the Types of Rational Action Based on the Model of the Four Journeys and Its Application in the Philosophy of Social Sciences.” Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers (University of Tehran), Spring 1404, No. 36. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1404b [2025]). “A New and Critical Account of the Reality of Matter in Philosophical Discussions Based on the Inner Interpretation of the Descent of Adam from the Perspective of Allameh Tabatabaʾi.” Biannual Journal of Religious Anthropology. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1404c [2025]). “A Critical Interpretation of the Subject–Object Dualism in Kant’s Philosophy Based on the Duality of Inner and Outer Worlds in the Narrative of Descent from a Philosophical-Exegetical Perspective of Allameh Tabatabaʾi.” Journal of Comparative Philosophy, Vol. 2, No. 2, Summer 1404. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (1404d [2025]). “A New Reading of the Nature and Rationale of the ‘Validity of Obligation’ in the Theory of Iʿtibariyyat Based on Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism.” Journal of Islamic Philosophy. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim. (n.d.). “An Ontological Analysis of the Arbaʿin of the Islamic Revolution and Entry into the Second Phase Based on Sadrian Philosophy.” In The Revolutionary System: Proceedings of the Conference on the Second Phase of the Islamic Revolution, Vol. 1. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim; Khani, Mohammadreza. (1399 [2020]). “A Comparison of the Division of the Realms of Being from the Perspectives of Allameh Tabatabaʾi and Islamic Mysticism.” Ayeneh-ye Maʿrefat, Spring 1399, No. 62, pp. 1–20. [in Persian]
Khani, Ebrahim; Rahighi, Hasan-Ali. (1394 [2015]). “Explaining the Ontological Structure of Mahdavi Civilization Based on the Soul–Body Relation from the Perspective of Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism.” Mashreq-e Mawʿud, Summer, No. 34, pp. 83–100. [in Persian]
Khomeini, Ruhollah. (1376 [1997]). Misbah al-Hidaya ila al-Khilafa wa al-Wilaya. Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works. [in Arabic]
Danaei-Fard, Hasan. (1395 [2016]). “Methodology of Signification Studies in the Social and Human Sciences: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches, and Stages of Implementation.” Hawza wa Daneshgah, No. 86, pp. 39–71. [in Persian]
Rafiʿi Qazvini, Seyyed Abolhasan. (1386 [2007]). Collected Philosophical Treatises and Articles. Tehran: Institute of Philosophy of Iran. [in Persian]
Searle, John R. (1395 [2016]). The Construction of Social Reality. Trans. Meysam Mohammad-Amini. Tehran: Nashr-e Now. [in Persian]
Suhrawardi, Shaykh Shahab al-Din. (1396 AH). Collected Works. Tehran: Iranian Association of Philosophy Publications. [in Arabic]
Sheikh-Rezaei, Hossein. (1388 [2009]). “Thinking Here and There: An Analytical Comparison of Philosophy Education Systems in Iran and the West.” Kheradnameh-ye Hamshahri, No. 33, pp. 82–84. [in Persian]
Saliba, Jamil. (1366 [1987]). Philosophical Dictionary. Tehran: Hekmat Publications. [in Persian]
Tabatabaʾi, Seyyed Mohammad-Hossein. (1390 AH). Al-Mizan. Qom: Jameʿeh-ye Modarresin. [in Arabic]
Tabatabaʾi, Seyyed Mohammad-Hossein. (1387 [2008]). The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism. Qom: Bustan-e Ketab. [in Persian]
Tabatabaʾi, Seyyed Mohammad-Hossein. (1404 AH). Nihayat al-Hikma. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [in Arabic]
Tabatabaʾi, Seyyed Mohammad-Hossein. (1428a AH). “Al-Insan fi al-Dunya.” In: Rabiʿi, Sabah & Asadi, Ali (eds.), Al-Insan wa al-ʿAqida. Qom: Baqiyat, pp. 43–58. [in Arabic]
Tabatabaʾi, Seyyed Mohammad-Hossein. (1428b AH). Risalat al-Wasaʾit. In: Rabiʿi, Sabah (ed.), Collected Treatises of Allameh Tabatabaʾi. Qom: Baqiyat. [in Arabic]
ʿAbbudiyyat, ʿAbd al-Rasul. (1393 [2014]). Sadrian Philosophy According to Allameh Tabatabaʾi. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational Institute. [in Persian]
ʿAbbudiyyat, ʿAbd al-Rasul. (1385 [2006]). An Introduction to the System of Sadrian Philosophy. Tehran: SAMT. [in Persian]
Fanari, Mohammad-Hamzeh. (1374 [1995]). Misbah al-Uns. Tehran: Mawla Publications. [in Arabic]
Fayazi, Gholamreza. (1388 [2009]). Being and Quiddity in the Sadrian School. Qom: Research Institute of Hawza and University. [in Persian]
Qomshaʾi, Aqa Mohammadreza. (1378 [1999]). Collected Works of Hakim Sohba. Isfahan: Research Center. [in Persian]
Qunawi, Sadr al-Din. (1381 [2002]). Iʿjaz al-Bayan fi Tafsir Umm al-Qurʾan. Qom: Islamic Propagation Office Publications. [in Arabic]
Qaysari, Davoud. (1377 [1998]). Treatises of Qaysari. Tehran: Iranian Association of Philosophy Publications. [in Arabic]
Qaysari, Davoud. (1425 AH). Sharh al-Qaysari ʿala Taʾiyya Ibn al-Farid. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya. [in Arabic]
Kashani, ʿAbd al-Razzaq. (1370 [1991]). Commentary on Fusūs al-Hikam. Qom: Bidar Publications. [in Arabic]
Majlesi, Mohammad-Baqer. (1404 AH). Bihar al-Anwar. Beirut: Al-Wafaʾ Institute. [in Arabic]
Mesbah-Yazdi, Mohammad-Taqi. (1380 [2001]). Commentary on the Four Journeys. Qom: Imam Khomeini Institute. [in Persian]
Motahhari, Morteza. (1384 [2005]). Collected Works of Martyr Motahhari. Tehran: Sadra. [in Persian]
Mulla Sadra. (1981). Al-Hikma al-Mutaʿaliya fi al-Asfar al-ʿAqliyya al-Arbaʿa. Beirut: Dar Ihyaʾ al-Turath. [in Arabic]
Mulla Sadra. (1354 [1975]). Al-Mabdaʾ wa al-Maʿad. Tehran: Iranian Association of Philosophy. [in Arabic]
Mulla Sadra. (1360 [1981]). Al-Shawahid al-Rububiyya fi al-Manahij al-Sulukiyya. Mashhad: University Publishing Center. [in Arabic]
Mulla Sadra. (n.d.). Al-Hikma al-Mutaʿaliya fi al-Asfar al-ʿAqliyya al-Arbaʿa. Qom: Al-Mustafawi Library. [in Arabic]
Mansouri, Abbas-Ali. (1399 [2020]). “A Pathology of Bidayat al-Hikma as a Text for Teaching Philosophy.” Journal of Research and Writing of University Textbooks, No. 46, pp. 50–74. [in Persian]
Yazdanpanah, Seyyed Yadollah. (1388 [2009]). Foundations and Principles of Theoretical Mysticism. Qom: Imam Khomeini Institute. [in Persian]