Contemporary Wisdom

A Study of Mahdi Elahi Ghomshei’s Thesis of the Necessary Existent’s Agency by Love: Theoretical Foundations in the Works of Earlier Muslim Philosophers

Document Type : Biannual Journal

Authors

mohammad javad dakami
Akbar orvatimovaffagh

Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Bu- Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30465/cw.2024.47448.2025
Abstract
Introduction
Muslim theologians and philosophers debate the manner in which the world was created by God. Theologians assert that God’s role in creation is characterized in terms of agency-by-intention (fāʿiliyya bi-l-qaṣd), while Peripatetic philosophers argue for agency-by-providence (fāʿiliyya bi-l-ʿināya), and Illuminationist (Ishrāqī) philosophers propose agency-by-agreement (fāʿiliyya bi-l-riḍā). Mullā Ṣadrā and his adherents advocate for agency-by-providence, where their definition of this kind of agency closely aligns with the concept of agency-by-manifestation (fāʿiliyya bi-l-tajallī) as suggested by Muslim mystics. Twentieth-century Muslim philosopher Mahdi Elahi Ghomshei introduced another form of agency, which he calls agency-by-love (fāʿiliyya bi-l-ʿishq). He posits that the primary impetus behind the creation of the world by the necessary existent is His love and delight for His own essence, serving as the source from which all things emanate. Elahi Ghomshei pioneered this concept to explain God’s agency. The central question of this study is whether this concept has precedent in the works of earlier Muslim philosophers and, if so, how it was addressed within those works.
Research Methodology
This research employs the analytic-descriptive method by examining library sources. Initially, we investigate the perspectives of the scholars concerning the agency of the necessary existent, and subsequently, we draw our conclusions.
Discussion and Results
An examination of the writings of philosophers and intellectuals predating Elahi Ghomshei reveals that they did not neglect the significance of love in God’s agency. Indeed, dating back to Plato and Aristotle, the role of love in the agency of the necessary existent has been consistently emphasized. Furthermore, certain philosophers contended that the creation of the world without love is inconceivable. However, instead of employing the term "agency by love," they utilized alternative expressions such as attraction force, natural magnetism, love-based motion, and others, as will be elucidated below.
Plato and Aristotle delved into the concept of the love of the demiurge—the creator of the world—or the unmoving mover for its own essence, highlighting its significance in imparting order and motion to worldly affairs. Among thinkers, Muslim philosophers and mystics stand out for their emphasis on God''s love and delight in His essence. Al-Fārābī offers a nuanced definition of love and delight, positing that the love of the necessary existent for its essence represents the pinnacle of love. He contends that God possesses the utmost perception, directed at the highest perceivable entity—His own essence. Thus, in the realm of the divine, the distinction between lover and beloved collapses, as they are one and the same.
Avicenna contends that the ultimate form of delight is found in the necessary existent''s delight in its own essence. This arises from its perfect perception of all beings, making it impervious to the realm of possibility and nonexistence. Avicenna posits that God is loved for His essence and is the object of love for all beings, suggesting that their very existence is sustained through their love for God. Shaykh al-Ishrāq Suhrawardī and Ṣadr al-Mutaʾallihīn also emphasize God''s profound inherent love for His essence, depicting Him as the most delighted being by its essence, and asserting that this fundamental love and delight are the primary impetuses behind the creation of the world.
Ibn al-ʿArabī asserts that all motion in this world, culminating in the existence of the universe, emanates from love—primarily the love possessed by God and also by other beings and natural causes through divine love. Without such affection, the world would remain unmanifest. Similarly, Imam Khomeini contends that divine love serves as the guiding and directing force in both the natural and supernatural realms (Imam Khomeini 1989, 76). He argues that existence and the sustenance of existence stem from essential love, which acts as both the existence-conferring and sustaining causes of beings. Referring to these two realms as the facilitators of creation and the pathways to perfection, he emphasizes that without this love, no entity could come into being, and no individual or object could attain perfection; thus, the heavens themselves are erected by love.
Conclusion
We conclude that although Mahdi Elahi Ghomshei was the first philosopher to employ the term "agency-by-love" to explain the agency of the necessary existent, discussions regarding God''s love for His own essence trace back to ancient times. Plato, Aristotle, and several other ancient Greek philosophers explored the notion of the creator''s love for its essence. In the Islamic world, mystics, philosophers, and theologians engaged with and endeavored to explain the notion of God''s agency within their respective frameworks. While they present various explanations for God''s agency—such as agency-by-intention, agency-by-providence, agency-by-agreement, or agency-by-manifestation—they unanimously affirm God''s possession of agency-by-love. These philosophers argue that perception is the source of love, with the intensity of love corresponding to the brilliance and beauty of the perceived entity. As God''s essence epitomizes beauty and brilliance, and He is both the perceiver and the perceived by His essence, He possesses the utmost love and delight for His essence.

Keywords

agent
creation
love
Elahi Ghomshei
perception

Subjects

ʿAḍud al-Dīn al-Ījī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Aḥmad. n.d. Al-Mawāqif. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub. [In Arabic]

Arianfar, Mahdi and Hassan Naghizadeh. 2019. “Barrasī va naqd-i ḥadīs̲-i kanz-i makhfī.” ʿUlūm-i ḥadīs̲ 12, no. 61: 171-87. [In Persian]

Aristotle. 2006. Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa (metaphysics). Translated by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi. Tehran: Tarh-e Now. [In Persian]

ʿAyn al-Quḍāt al-Hamdānī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Muḥammad. 2007. Tamhīdāt. Edited by Afif Asiran. Tehran: Manouchehri. [In Arabic]

Copleston, Frederick. 1996. Tārīkh-i falsafih. Translated by Jalaloddin Mojtabavi. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]

Dakami, Mohammad Javad. 2005. “Ṣāniʿ (demiurge) dar andīshih-yi Aflāṭūn.” Āyinih-yi maʿrifat, no. 7: 1-16. [In Persian]

Ebrahimi Dinani, Gholam-Hossein. 1997. Shuʿāʿ-i andīshih va shuhūd dar falsafih-yi Suhrawardī. Tehran: Hekmat. [In Persian]

Elahi Ghomshei, Mahdi. 1984. Ḥikmat-i ilāhī-yi ʿāmm va khāṣṣ. Tehran: Islami. [In Persian]

Esmaeilinia, Fatemeh and Hassan Soltani Koohbani. 2017. “Barrasī-yi rābiṭih-yi ʿishq va āfarīnish dar Kashf al-asrār wa-ʿuddat al-abrār Maybudī.” ʿIrfāniyyāt dar adab-i Fārsī 30, no. 8: 32-43. [In Persian]

Fanārī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad Ḥamza. 1995. Miṣbāḥ al-uns. Edited by Mohammad Khajovi. Tehran: Mowla. [In Arabic]

Fārābī, Abū Naṣr al-. 2000. Andīshih-hāyi ahl-i madīnih-yi fāḍilih. Translated by Sayyid Jafar Shahidi. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. [In Persian]

Furley, David. 2013. Tārīkh-i falsafih-yi Routledge. Translated by Ali Moazzami. Tehran: Cheshmeh. [In Persian]

Ghazālī, Muḥammad al-. n.d. Iḥyāʾ ʿulūm al-dīn. Edited by Shaykh Abdelaziz Sirwan. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam. [In Arabic]

Gilson, Étienne. 1991. Rūḥ-i falsafih-yi qurūn-i vusṭā. Translated by Alimorad Davoodi. Tehran: Elmi-Farhangi. [In Persian]

Gilson, Étienne. 1995. Khudā va falsafih. Translated by Shahram Pazouki. Tehran: Haghighat. [In Persian]

Guthrie, William Keith Chambers. 1997. Tārīkh-i falsafih-yi Yūnān. Translated by Hassan Fathi. Tehran: Fekr-e Rooz. [In Persian]

Hassanzadeh Amoli, Hassan. 1986. Hizār va yik nuktih. Tehran: Raja. [In Persian]

Hassanzadeh Amoli, Hassan. 1993. Khayr al-athar dar radd-i jabr va qadar. Qom: Islamic Propagation Office. [In Persian]

Ḥillī, al-Ḥasan al-. 1991. Kashf al-murād. Translated and explained by Abolhassan Sharani. Tehran: Eslamiyya Bookstore. [In Arabic]

Ibn al-Manẓūr. 1987. Lisān al-ʿArab. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn. 1996. Al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt. Qom: Nashr al-Balāgha. [In Arabic]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn. 2004. Risāla dar ḥaqīqat va kayfiyyat-i silsila-yi mawjūdāt va tasalsul-i asbāb va musabbibāt. Hamadan: Bu-Ali Sina University. [In Persian]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn. 2013. Ishārāt va tanbīhāt. Translated and explained by Hassan Malekshahi. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn. 2021. Rasāʾil Ibn Sīnā. Qom: Bidar. [In Arabic]

ʿIrāqī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-. 1992. Lumuʿāt. Edited by Mohammad Khajovi. Tehran: Mowla. [In Arabic]

Jāmī, Nūr al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-. 2004. Ashiʿʿat al-lumuʿāt. Edited by Hadi Rastgar Moghaddam Gohari. Qom: Boostan-e Ketab. [In Persian]

Javadi Amoli, Abdollah. 1989. Raḥiq-i makhtūm. Qom: Esra. [In Persian]

Khomeini, Ruhollah. 1989. Chihil ḥadīs̲. Tehran: Raja Cultural Publishing Center. [In Persian]

Khomeini, Ruhollah. 1994. Miṣbāḥ al-hidāya ilā al-khilāfa wa-l-wilāya. Prefaced by Sayyid Jalaloddin Ashtiani. Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of the Works of Imam Khomeini. [In Arabic]

Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir. 1983. Biḥār al-anwār. Beirut: al-Wafāʾ Institute. [In Arabic]

Mawlawī, Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad. 1978. Mathnawī maʿnawī. Edited by Richard Nicholson. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [In Persian]

Narāqī, Muḥammad Mahdī. 2002. Al-Lumuʿāt al-ʿarshiyya. Edited by Ali Awjabi. Karaj: Ahd.

Nussbaum, Martha. 1995. Arasṭū. Translated by Ezzatollah Fouladvand. Tehran: Tarh-e Now.

Plato. 1972. Timaeus. Translated by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi. Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian]

Rāzī, Najm al-Dīn Dāya al-. 1977. “Sharḥ ḥadīth kuntu kanzan makhfiyyan.” Edited by Mohammad Taghi Daneshpazhooh. Jāvīdān khirad, no. 3: 28-33. [In Persian]

Sabzawārī, Mullā Hādī al-. 1993. Sharḥ al-asmāʾ al-ḥusnā. Edited by Najafgholi Habibi. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Arabic]

Sabzawārī, Mullā Hādī al-. 2004. Asrār al-ḥikam. Edited by Karim Feizi. Qom: Matbuʿāt Dīnī. [In Arabic]

Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-. 1975. Al-Mabdaʾ wa-l-maʿād. Tehran: Iranian Association of Philosophy. [In Arabic]

Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-. 1981. Al-Ḥikmat al-mutaʿāliya fī l-asfār al-ʿaqliyyat al-arbaʿa. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]

Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-. 1996. Shawāhid al-rubūbiyya. Translated and explained by Javad Mosleh. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]

Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-. 2004. Al-Ḥikmat al-mutaʿāliya fī l-asfār al-ʿaqliyyat al-arbaʿa. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]

Shahrazūrī, Shams al-Dīn al-. 1993. Sharḥ ḥikmat al-ishrāq. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]

Shajari, Morteza. 2009. “Āfarīnish bar asās-i ʿishq va qāʿidih-yi al-wāḥid az dīdgāh-i Ibn ʿArabī.” Pazhūhish-hāyi falsafī-kalāmī, no. 40: 83-108. [In Persian]

Suhrawardī, Shahāb al-Dīn al-. 1993. Majmūʿih muṣannafāt-i Shaykh Ishrāq. Vols. 2-3. Edited by Henry Corbin. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]

Suhrawardī, Shahāb al-Dīn al-. 1994. Ḥikmat al-ishrāq. Edited by Henry Corbin. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Arabic]

Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn. 1995. Nihāyat al-ḥikma. Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Arabic]

Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn al-. 1988. Sharḥ al-maqāṣid. Qom: al-Sharīf al-Raḍī. [In Arabic]

Tahānuwī, Muḥammad ʿAlī ibn ʿAlī. 1967. Kashshāf iṣṭilāḥāt al-funūn. Beirut: Maktaba Lebanon Nāshirūn. [In Arabic]

Contemporary Wisdom
Volume 14, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
February 2024
Pages 139-163

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us