Contemporary Wisdom

A Sadraean Analysis and Critique of Constructed Concepts in Illuminationist Philosophy

Document Type : Biannual Journal

Authors

zohre zarei 1
Qodratullah Qorbani 2

1 PhD student, Transcendent Wisdom, Kharazmi University (corresponding author

2 Associate professor, Kharazmi University, Tehran

https://doi.org/10.30465/cw.2021.7271
Abstract
Introduction
This research deals with Mullā Ṣadrā’s objections to constructed (iʿtibārī) concepts in Illuminationist philosophy. A major philosophical issue in Islamic philosophy today is a division of universal concepts into quiddity-based (māhuwī), logical, and philosophical. Suhrawardī and philosophers before him had just discerned the difference between real (ḥaqīqī) and constructed concepts, placing them respectively into objective and subjective categories, and until Mullā Ṣadrā’s time, the division was restricted to first intelligibles (al-maʿqūlāt al-ūlā) or quiddity-based concepts and secondaryintelligibles (al-maʿqūlāt al-thāniya) or logical concepts, and the place of philosophical concepts was not clear.
Accordingly, Suhrawardī subsumes concepts such as existence, unity, multiplicity, necessity, possibility, and colorfulness under constructed concepts without drawing a distinction between logical and philosophical concepts. This was mainly because there is no distinction between these concepts in the external world, and because repetition and vicious regress would follow if infinite attributes coextensively existed.
In addition to his critique of Suhrawardī for having distinguished concepts into subjective and objective, Mullā Ṣadrā challenged Suhrawardī’s views of each of these concepts.
Research Method or Approach
This research adopts a fundamental descriptive-analytic method and relies on Mullā Ṣadrā’s commentaries on Suhrawardī’s Sharḥ ḥikmat al-ishrāq (Exposition of the wisdom of illumination) to elaborately deal with Suhrawardī’s remarks concerning constructed concepts and Mullā Ṣadrā’s objections to these views. Data of the research have been collected through a library method, and cases were extracted by indexing. Finally, by drawing on the intellectual method, the indexed contents were analyzed and criticized, and the views were critically analyzed and considered.
Discussion and Conclusion
Here is a summary of findings of the research:

A major contribution of Suhrawardī concerning concepts was a division of concepts into subjective and objective, by which all philosophical concepts such as existence, unity, multiplicity, necessity, possibility, colorfulness, and relation are subsumed under purely constructed concepts, without corresponding to anything in the external reality.
Suhrawardī’s main reason for the negation of external distinction in the case of philosophical concepts is that the coextensive existence of infinite attributes implies vicious regress and repetition, since in his Talwīḥāt, Suhrawardī proposes a criterion for the distinction between the subjective and the objective and for the impossibility of the distinction in the external world, according to which everything whose occurrence implies repetition and regress counts as constructed.
Major objections raised by Mullā Ṣadrā against Suhrawardī’s account of constructed concepts, which serves as the foundation and tenet of the rest of his objections, are as follows:


Absence of any distinction between philosophical and logical secondaryintelligibles
Confusion between concepts and their instances
Failure to take account of the organic composition (al-tarkīb al-ittiḥādī) between quiddities and existences
Conflation of the name and what is named
Confusion between primary essential predication (al-ḥaml al-awwalī al-dhātī) and common technical predication (al-ḥaml al-shāʾiʿ al-ṣunāʿī).

Given these findings, the obstacles, problems, and proposals of the research are as follows:

While most of Mullā Ṣadrā’s objections are accurate and based on his insights into the problem of intelligibles, some of his objections are not plausible because of their anachronistic nature.
Although in some cases, Suhrawardī’s remarks are attacked and even undermined by Mullā Ṣadrā’s objections, in some cases it is open to us to criticize and adjudicate the two parties and even offer novel contributions to the debate since Mullā Ṣadrā has rested content with Avicenna’s views, among other predecessors, and did not offer an alternative account.

Keywords

Constructed (iʿtibārī)concepts
first intelligibles
secondaryintelligibles
Suhrawardī
Mullā Ṣadrā
Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn  ʿAbd Allāh. 1983a. Al-Shifāʾ: al-ilāhiyyāt (The healing: theology). Edited by SaʿīdZāyid. Qom: Library of Ayatollah Marʿashī Najafī. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn  ʿAbd Allāh. 1983b. Al-Shifāʿ: al-manṭiq (The healing: logic). Edited by SaʿīdZāyid. Qom: Library of Ayatollah Marʿashī Najafī. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn  ʿAbd Allāh. 1983c. Al-Taʿlīqāt (The commentaries). Edited by Abdel Rahman Badawi. Beirut: Maktabat al-Iʿlām al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
Aristotle. 1980. Manṭiq(Logic). Edited by Abdel Rahman Badawi. Vole one. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam. [In Arabic]
Ismāʿīlī, Masʿūd. 2009. “Maʿqūl-ithānīfalsafīdarfalsafa-yi Ṣadr al-Mutaʾtallihīn” (Philosophical secondary intelligible in Mullā Ṣadrā’s philosophy). Dhihn 10, no. 40: 17-54.[In Persian]
Ismāʿīlī, Masʿūd. 2011. “Mafāhīm-ifalsafīazdīdgāh-i Suhrawardī” (Philosophical concepts in Suhrawardī’s view). Pazhūhish-hāyiFalsafīKalāmī 13, no. 2(50): 5-31.[In Persian]
Āzhīr, Asadullāh and MaʿṣumaSūranī. 2014. “Mafāhīm-i iʿtibārī darḥikmat-iishrāqīwaḥikmat-iṢadrāʾī: pazhūhishītaṭbīqīdarbara-yimaʿqūl-ithānīazdīdgāh-i Shaykh IshrāqwaʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī” (Constructed concepts in Illuminaitonist philosophy and Sadraean philosophy: a comparative research about the secondary intelligible in the views of Suhrawardī and ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī). Ḥikmat-iṢadrāʾī 3, no. 1: 9-24. [In Persian]
Bahmanyār ibn Marzbān Iṣfahānī, Abu-l-Ḥasan. 1996. Al-Taḥṣīl (The acquisition). Edited by Murtaḍā Muṭahharī. Second edition. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
JawādīĀmulī, ʿAbd Allāh. 2007. Raḥīqmakhtūm: sharḥ jild-iawwal-iasfār (The sealed drink: exposition of the first volume of Asfār). Edited by ḤamīdPārsāniyā. Vol. 2. Third edition. Qom: Isrāʾ Publication. [In Persian]
Ḥasanpūr, Maryam, Muḥammad Pūrʿabbās, and QudsiyaAkbarī. 2015. “Barrasī-yitaṭbīqī-yimaʿqūl-ithānī-yifalsafīdarandīsha-yi Suhrawardī wa Ṣadr al-Mutaʾallihīn” (A comparative study of philosophical secondary intelligible in the thoughts of Suhrawardī and Ṣadr al-Mutaʾallihīn). Maʿrifat-iFalsafī 13, no. 1: 53-77. [In Persian]
Ḥusaynzāda, Muḥammad. 2005. “Ṭabaqabandī-yimafāhīmazmanẓar-i maʿrifat-shināsān-imusalmān” (A classification of concepts in the view of Muslim epistemologists). Maʿrifat, no. 99: 28-36. [In Persian]
Khwānsārī, Muḥammad. 1974. Manṭiq-iṣūrī (Formal logic). Vol. 1. Third edition. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. 1990. Al-Mabāḥith al-mashriqiyya fī ʿilm al-ilāhiyyātwa-l-ṭabīʿiyyāt (The eastern issues in the science of theology and naturals). Vol. 1. Second edition. Qom: Bīdār. [In Arabic]
Rawḍātī, Sayyid Muḥammad. 2003. “Naqd-inaẓariyya-yi Mullā Ṣadrā darbāra-yimaʿqūl-ithānī-yifalsafī” (A critique of Mullā Ṣadrā’s theory of philosophical secondary intelligible). Maqālātwabarrasī-hā 36, o. 5(728): 161-168. [In Persian]
Zarei, Zohreh, and Asad AllāhĀzhīr. 2018. “Barrasī-yimafhūm-i wujūd aznaẓar-i Kant wa Suhrawardī” (A consideration of the concept of existence in the views of Kant and Suhrawardī). Āyīn-iḤikmat, no. 36: 83-102. [In Persian]
Zarei, Zohreh, and Amīr Shīrzād. 2016. “Naqdwabarrasī-yiadilla-yi Suhrawardī bar iʿtibāriyyat-i wujūd bātakya bar mabānī-yi Mullā Ṣadrā” (A critique and consideration of Suhrawardī’s arguments for the constructed character of existence by reliance on Mullā Ṣadrā’s principles). Justār-hāyīdarFalsafawa Kalām, no. 97: 97-108. [In Persian]
SirājṢādiqī, Muḥammad Ḥasan. 1997. “Naqdwabarrasī-yiintiqādāt-i Ṣadr al-Mutaʾallihīn bar Shaykh Ishrāqdarmasʾala-yi wujūd” (A critique and consideration of Mullā Ṣadrā’s objections to Suhrawardī concerning the problem of existence). MA diss., Imam Sadeq University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Suhrawardī, Shahāb al-Dīn. 1996a. Majmūʿamuṣannafāt-i Shaykh Ishraq: al-Talwīḥāt (Collected works of Suhrawardī: The intimations). Vol. 1. Edited by Henry Corbin. Second edition. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]
Suhrawardī, Shahāb al-Dīn. 1996b. Majmūʿamuṣannafāt-i Shaykh Ishraq: al-muqāwamāt (Collected works of Suhrawardī: The apposites). Vol. 1. Edited by Henry Corbin. Second edition. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]
Suhrawardī, Shahāb al-Dīn. 1996c. Majmūʿamuṣannafāt-i Shaykh Ishraq: al-Mashāriʿwa-l-muṭāraḥāt (Collected works of Suhrawardī: The paths and heavens). Vol. 1. Edited by Henry Corbin. Second edition. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]
Suhrawardī, Shahāb al-Dīn. 1996d. Majmūʿamuṣannafāt-i Shaykh Ishraq: Ḥikmat al-ishrāq (Collected works of Suhrawardī: Philosophy of illumination). Vol. 2. Edited by Henry Corbin. Second edition. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]
Shahrazūrī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad. 1993. Sharḥ ḥikmat al-ishrāq. Edited by Ḥusayn ẒiyāʾīTurbatī. First edition. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]
Shīrāzī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. 1999. Risālat al-ḥudūth (Essay on incipience). Edited by Sayyid Ḥusayn Mūsawiyān. First edition. Tehran: Sadra Islamic Philosophy Foundation. [In Arabic]
Shīrāzī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. 2009. Taʿlīqāt Ṣadr al-Mutaʾallihīnʿalā sharḥ ḥikmat al-ishrāq (Mullā Ṣadrā’s commentaries on the exposition of philosophy of illumination). Edited by Sayyid Muḥammad Mūsawī Bāyagī. Vol. 1. First edition. Tehran: Ḥikmat. [In Arabic]
Shīrāzī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. 1981. Al-Ḥikmat al-mutaʿāliya fi-l-asfār al-ʿaqliyya al-arbaʿa (The transcendent wisdom on the four intellectual journeys). Vol. 1, 2, 7. Second edition. Beirut: DārIḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Arabic]
Shīrāzī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. N.d.Al-Ḥāshiyaʿalāilāhiyyāt al-shifāʾ (Commentary on the theory of healing). Qom: Bīdār. [In Arabic]
Shīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn. 2004. Sharḥ ḥikmat al-ishrāq (Exposition of philosophy of illumination). Edited by ʿAbd Allāh Nūrānī and Mahdī Muḥaqqiq. First edition. Tehran: Society for the National Heritage of Iran. [In Arabic]
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. N.d.Uṣūl-ifalsafawarawish-iriʾālīsm(Principles of philosophy and the method of realism). Preface and comments by Murtaḍā Muṭahharī. Vol. 2. Tehran: Offset Press Inc. [In Persian]
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. N.d.Nihāyat al-ḥikma (The ultimate wisdom). 12th edition. Qom: Islamic Publication Institute affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers in Qom. [In Arabic]
Fārābī, Abū Naṣr. 1986. Kitāb al-ḥurūf (Book of letters). Edited by Muḥsin Mahdī. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq. [In Arabic]
Fārābī, Abū Naṣr. 1987. Al-Manṭiqiyyāt (Logics). Vol. 3. Edited by Muḥammad TaqīDānishpazhūh. First edition. Qom: Library of Ayatollah Marʿashī Najafī. [In Arabic]
Muṭahharī, Murtaḍā. 1991a. Majmūʿaāthār: sharḥ-imabsūṭ-imanẓūma (Collected works: a detailed exposition of Manẓūma). Vol. 9. First edition. Tehran: Ḥikmat. [In Persian]
Muṭahharī, Murtaḍā. 1991b. Majmūʿaāthār: dars-hāyiasfār (Collected works: Lectures on Asfār). Vol. 11. First edition. Tehran: Ḥikmat. [In Persian]
Muẓaffar, Muḥammad Riḍā. 1989. Manṭiq (Logic). Translated by ManūchihrṢāniʿīDarrabīdī. Sixth edition. Tehran: Ḥikmat. [In Persian]
Mūsawī Bāyagī, Muḥammad and MujtabāRaḥmāniyān. 2017. “Ḥall-imuʿḍal-imaʿqūl-ithānī-yifalsafītawassuṭ-i Ṣadr al-Mutaʾallihīnwathamara-yiān” (Mullā Ṣadrā’s solution for the problem of philosophical secondary intelligible and its consequence). Āmūza-hāyiFalsafa-yiIslāmī 12, no. 20: 127-144. [In Persian]
Contemporary Wisdom
Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 33
November 2021
Pages 115-157

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us