Contemporary Wisdom

Ontology of value from the perspective of transcendental wisdom with an emphasis on the evil problemand problem of good and bad.

Document Type : Biannual Journal

Authors

habilah danesh shahraki
Ali Sadeghinejad

Islamic philosophy and theology department, Theology faculty, Qom university, Qom

https://doi.org/10.30465/cw.2019.3587
Abstract
The issue of the value of judgment is an issue that is important in the philosophy of ethics, the philosophy of law, and the philosophy of religion. From this perspective, Transcendental wisdom, as the transcendental philosophy that must be extracted from the other philosophies, should provide an ontological basis for this value of judgment, in order to determine where the value of judgment is, how it should be and Its ontological basis is determined. The issue of truth and logical truth, error and misconception, good and evil, as well as good and bad are the topics that have been studied as an example in this essay. The originality of existence, the systematic ambiguity of existence, the existential and human perfection of man are the principles which, from the perspective of transcendental wisdom, provide the ontological basis for the value of arbitration. In the end, it seems that with the results of these principles, namely, the equality of existence with the good and the failure to think evil, as well as the simultaneous emphasis on the will of the nature of existence, it is hardly possible to derive from these realistic values for Extracted human verbs.

Keywords

Ontology
value
value judgment
Good and Evil
goodness and badness
  1. Ashtiani, Seyyed Jalal al-Din, 1999, Selection of works of the Divine Theologians, Second Edition,Center for Publications of the Islamic advertising Office of Qom Seminary, Qom.
  2.  Patterson, Michael, and others, 1997, Reason and Religious Belief, Translation by Ahmad Naraghi and Ibrahim Soltani, Tarheno, Tehran.
  3. Javadi, Mohsen, MohammadiSheykhi, Ghobad, 2008, Semantics of goodness and badness from the point of view of the Muslim scholars, Aiene-Marefat, No. 16, pp. 45-76.
  4. Sobhani, Mohammad Taghi, AbdulmanafBayati, Haidar, 2010, A critical look at the most important responses of evil forms, The Journal of Wisdom and Islamic Philosophy, No. 34, pp. 135-148.
  5. Sabzevari, Mollahadi, 1996, Explanation of Alasma, Second Edition, Tehran University, Tehran
  6. Shamly, Nasrallah, 2011, Restoration of Ethical Theorems in Transcendent Wisdom, Academic Letter to Specialized Ethics, No. 23, pp. 57-84
  7. Sharifi, Ahmad Hossein, 2012, Determining the Conceptual Geometry of Types of Values, Revelation Ethics, No. 2, pp. 105-122
  8. Sadr al-Mutaleh-iin, Mohammed ibn Ibrahim, 1988, al-Hikma al-Mutaleyahi fi al-Asfar al-Aqliya al-'Abray, Dar Allahya al-Tarath al-Arabi, Beirut.
  9. Sadr al-Mutaleh-iin, Mohammad ibn Ibrahim, 1360, alshawahudalrububiat fi almanahijalsalukyhi,, Second edition, Al-Muqas al-JumeiLlnshar, Mashhad

10. Sadr al-Mutaleh-iin, Mohammad ibn Ibrahim, 1363, Mufatih al-Ghab, Correction by Mohammad Khajavi, Cultural Studies and Research Institute, Tehran.

11. Sadr al-Mutaleh-iin, Mohammad ibn Ibrahim, 2004, Explaining of theUsul al-Kafi, Correction of Mohammad Khajavi, Institute for Cultural Studies and Research, Tehran.

12. Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad Hussein, 1998, Description of the Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism, Introduction and Footnote MortezaMotahari, Sadra, Tehran

13. Karimzadeh, Ghorban Ali, FaramarzGharamaleki, Ahad, QadrdanQaramaleki, Mohammad Hassan, 2011, Perceptual Evil from the Viewpoint of Sadr al-Mutaleh-iin, The New Religion, No. 25, pp. 27-44

14. Motahari, Martyr Morteza, 2001, Collection of works, 1, 10th edition, Sadra, Tehran.

15. Manafian, Seyyed Mohammad, 2008, Introduction to MullaSadra's Ethics Philosophy, Kheradname-Sadra, No. 51, pp. 74-83

 

Contemporary Wisdom
Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 27
November 2018
Pages 93-113

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us