Document Type : Biannual Journal

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Islamic Studies Department, Yazd University, Yszd,Iran, (Responsible author),

2 Associate Professor, Islamic Philosophy and Theology Department, Tabriz University

Abstract

Abstract
The importance of investigating between priority and posteriority with concomitance is in the representation of the relationship between their following issues. These concepts are related to the fundamental issues in different philosophical approaches. The question of the article is: with the change in the philosophical view from the originality of essence to the originality of existence of gradational oneness and then the originality of existence of personal oneness, what is the relation between priority and posteriority with concomitance? According to the originality of essence  the principle is with the priority and posteriority in many types. But according to the originality of existence, the existential concomitance becomes original. In the second journey, according to the gradation in existence, priority and posteriority are meant at the same time as existential stages, while in personal oneness only among the manifestations of Hāqq, emergence gradation occurs. The result of this research shows: The third journey, which is dominated by absolute oneness, is called the “qayyūmiyyā concomitance” and Because of this feature, priority and posteriority give way to concomitance.
KeyWords: Priority and Posteriority, Concomitance, The Originality of Essence, Gradational Oneness, Personal Oneness
priority and posteriority are intellectual and mental meanings and are the result of a comparison that the intellect makes between two things. The compatibility of priority and posteriority with pluralistic philosophical schools and concomitance with monistic ideas is clear. This compatibility is a motivation for answering the question: How does the relationship between priority and posteriority change with concomitance, in proportion to the change in philosophical approach from the originality of essence to the originality and gradation unity of existence and then the personal unity of existence? This issue has been examined with the focus on Sadra'i's transcendental wisdom.
    The third stage is the manifestation of the one existence of truth (haqq), which causes another type of “Superior Priority”. Based on which, beyond the existence of truth, there is truly nothing that can be placed on its side and find a relationship with it, even if it is posterior. Only between the manifestations of truth itself is a kind of manifestational gradation conceivable, which replaces existential gradation in the second stage.
 
Conclusion
In the essential stage, concomitance is a non-existent, invalid, relatives concept, and subject to priority and posteriority. Therefore, originality and gradation are characteristics of priority and posteriority, While in the gradational unity of existence, this role is entrusted to  concomitance, although priority and posteriority are also valid as a consequence of the existential concomitance. finally, with the unity of the personality, pure originality is achieved to the concomitance, and any priority or  posteriority becomes meaningless, because the concomitance is one with the unity, that is, the existence of the truth (haqq). We interpret this finding as " The transformation of »priority and posteriority « into » concomitance «. This is reflected in Mulla Sadra's statement with the term "Qayyumiyyah concomitance ", in which the manifestations are nothing other than the guardianship of haqq (God).

Keywords

Main Subjects

Anwari, Saeed; Hashemi Attar, Khadija. (2019). A Study of the Advancement and Delay of Essence and Its Historical Course in Islamic Philosophy. History of Philosophy. 10(2): 142-113. [In Parsian]
http://hop.mullasadra.org/Article/23487
Babaei, Ali. (2025). Three Stages of Precession and Recency based on Three Philosophical Journeys. Philosophical Reflections. 14(33): 202-179. [In Parsian].https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_721507.html
Bahmanyar bin Marzban. (1375) .al-tahsil. Edited by Morteza Motahari. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Arabic]
Hosseini, Ruhollah. (1979). Elucidation and Analysis of "Priority and Posteriority-by-Truth" in the Thought of Mullā Ṣadrā. Islamic Wisdom. 10(3): 209-191. [In Parsian]
https://fhi.hekmateislami.com/article_186915.html
Ibn Arabi, Muhi‌eddin. (N,D). Al-Futuhat al-Makkiyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Sadr. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina, Hussein bin Abdullah. (1404). Al-Ta'liqat. Researched by Abd al-Rahman Badawi. Qom: Islamic Media School. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina, Hussein bin Abdullah. (1376). Al-elahiyat from the Book of shefa. Researched by Hassan Hassanzadeh Amoli. Qom: Islamic Propagation Office of the Qom Seminary. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina, Hussein bin Abdullah. (1379). Al-Najat. Tehran: Tehran University (Institute of Publishing and Printing). [In Arabic]
 Javadi Amoli,  Abdullah. (1396). Raheeq - makhtoom.  Researched by Hamid Parsania. Qom. Asra Publishing Center. [In Parsian]
Lahiji, Abdul Razzaq bin Ali. (1425). Shavaregh  al- elham, fi  sharh-e- tajrid al- kalam  . Researched by Akbar Asad Alizadeh. Qom: Imam Sadiq Foundation. [In Arabic] 
Mirdamad, Mohammad Baqir bin Mohammad. (1381). Works of Mirdamad (Al-Sirat al-Mustaqeem). Compiled by Abdullah Noorani. Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Honors Association. [In Arabic]
Motahari, Morteza. (1376). Collection of Works of Motahari. Tehran: Sadra. [In Parsian]
obboudit, Abd al-Rasoul. (1390). An Introduction to the System of Sadrā’i Philosophy. Tehran: Samt. [In Parsian]
Qeysari, Davud. (1382), Qaysari’s rasael. Researched and edited by Seyyed Jalal al-Din Ashtiani. Tehran: Iranian Philosophy and Wisdom Research Institute. [In Arabic]
Qeysari, Davud. (1375). sharh -e- fosus al- hekmah. Researched and edited by Seyyed Jalal al-Din Ashtiani. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. [In Arabic]
Saadatmand, Mahdi ; Babaei, Ali. (1997). The Evolution of the Concept of "Abstraction" in Three Philosophical Frameworks (essential view, the originality of existence, organizational unity, and personal unity). Islamic Philosophy and Theology. 56(1): 113-97. [In Parsian].  https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_94058.html
Saadatmand, Mahdi ; Babaei, Ali. (2025). Three Levels of “Universal” and “Particular” Based on Three Philosophical Approaches (Quiddity Correspondence, Gradational Inclusion in Existential Levels, The Encompassing of Divine Being over Manifestations). Islamic Philosophy and Theology. 57(2): 541-519. [In Parsian]. https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_100763.html
Saadatmand, Mahdi ; Babaei, Ali. (1996). Three Stages of Attribution of Knowledge According to Three Philosophical Journeys; The Originality of Nature, the Originality of the Existence of Gradational Oneness and the Originality of the Existence of Personal Oneness. Philosophical Studies. 18(46): 226-210. [In Parsian]
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_17729.html
Sabzevari, Hadi bin Mahdi. (1369). Sharh al-Manzoomeh. Notes by Hassanzadeh Amoli. Tehran: Nab Publishing Center. [In Arabic]
Sadr, Reza. (1387). Sahaef –men- al- falsafeh (Commentary on the  of Manzoomeh for Sabzevari). Qom: Bostan Kitab. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1392). Al-talighat hekmat al- eshragh. With correction, research and introduction by Najfqali Habibi. Tehran, Sadra Islamic Hikmat Foundation. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1366a). Interpretation of the Holy Quran. Qom: Bidar. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1368). Al-hekmat al- motaalieh fi al-asfar al- aghliah al- arbaeh. Qom: Maktaba al-Mustafawi. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1366b). Explanation of Osool al-Kafi. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education, Institute for Cultural Studies and Research (Research). [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1382). Explanation of elahiyat shefa. Tehran: Sadra Islamic Foundation. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1360). shavahed al- roboobieh. With Sabzevari's footnotes and corrections by Seyyed Jalal al-Din Ashtiani. Tehran: University Publishing Center. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1354). mabdaa –va- maad. Tehran: Iranian Society of Wisdom and Philosophy. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1302). Collection of the Nine Treatises. Qom: Maktaba al-Mustafawi. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1375). Collection of philosophical treatises by Sadr al-Mutalahin. Researched and edited by Hamed Naji Isfahani. Tehran: Hikmat. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1363a). Al-Masha'er. Translation and commentary by Imam Qoli ibn Muhammad Ali Imad al-Dawla. Tehran: Tahouri. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1378). Mazaher al- elahyieh. Tehran: Sadra Islamic Foundation. [In Arabic]
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (Mulla Sadra). (1363b). Mafatih al-Ghayb. Edited by Mohammad Khawaji. Tehran: Cultural Studies and Research Institute, Islamic Society of Wisdom and Philosophy of Iran. [In Arabic]
Shirvani, Ali. (1383), Translation and explanation of Nahayyat al-Hikmah, Allama Seyyed Mohammad Hossein Tabataba'i. Qom: Bostan Ketab. [In Parsian]
Sajjadi, Jafar. (1375). Dictionary of Philosophical and Theological Sciences. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [In Parsian]
Samadi Amoli, Davud. (1386), Sharh Nahayyah al-Hikmah (Samadi). Qom: Qaem Al-Muhammad (A.J.).  [InParsian]
Suhrawardi, Yahya ibn Habash. (1372). Hekmat al-eshragh (Collection of Works by Sheikh eshragh). Edited by Henry Corbin, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, and Najafqali Habibi. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education, Institute for Cultural Studies and Research (Research). [In Arabic]
Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein. (1416). nahayat al-hekmah. Qom: The Group of Teachers in the Scientific Seminary in Qom, Islamic Publishing Foundation. [In Arabic]