Document Type : Biannual Journal

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in the theoretical foundations of Islam at Shahid Beheshti University.( Corresponding Author)

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Theology and Religions, Shahid Beheshti University

3 Associate Professor of Wisdom and Theology Department, Faculty of Theology and Religions, Shahid Beheshti University.

10.30465/cw.2024.45779.1999

Abstract

Abstract
Determining the reason for legislating worships and their role in other human affairs provides the opportunity for perceptions such as the intrinsic purpose, negative dignity or positive and preparatory dignity of worships. The present research is trying to answer this question that in the eyes of Sadr al-Mutalahin Shirazi, what is the status of worship in the origin, evolution or emergence of human conditions and knowledge? The purpose of this research is to discover the functions of worship in this process, which is followed by descriptive-analytical method. Sadra considers the rulings to be subject to the criteria of self-determination and considers the purpose of legislating rulings to be to provide general benefit and general expediency to humans. Based on the findings of this research, in explaining the relationship between actions, circumstances and knowledge, the existence of real criteria for worship should be accepted and focused on the interaction between human affairs and the process of the two ascending and descending arcs of the voluntary course of man. According to Sadra, the aforementioned three authorities have a bilateral and multilateral relationship, and discovering this relationship is possible through understanding the interactive movement between the soul and the body and explaining the collective reality of human beings. Paying attention to the interactive relationship and the positive-preparatory interaction between the soul and the body, and the concession and escalation of the citizen of the two, shows that actions in the arc of ascent have non-existent, preparatory and preliminary status, and in the arc of descent, they have existential and fruitful status.
 
Introduction
Man is a being who has a benefit from the lower world, i.e. the world, and a share from the upper world, i.e. the hereafter. Every religious practice also has an external shell and an internal core; The shell is related to this world and its core is related to the hereafter, just as the Sharia's meaning of the purity of clothes and body is the purity of the heart, which is the inner core, and the purity of the heart is to purify it from religious pollution such as disbelief and reprehensible filth. Morality is like envy, miserliness, extravagance, similarly, the meaning of the Shariah of any worship is the effect it creates in the heart. (Sadr al-Din Shirazi, 1366 A: 1/279) If there are no real benefits and harms behind the acts of worship, then talking about the effect of action in the creation of knowledge will not have the same meaning.
 
Method
In the upcoming article, we will analyze the wisdom of the law of worship or commitment to worship (by relying on and analyzing the texts of the Sadras). Sadra believes in the basis of rulings on merits and demerits and documents Sharia rulings on merits and demerits. It is important to address this issue because it states whether the desired materials are genuine in essence and purpose or are they merely preparatory and preliminary? For this purpose, based on the thoughts of Sadrul Matalhin Shirazi, the following of the rulings is explained first, and then the nonexistent or existential dignity of the phrase, and in other words, their preparatory or positive dignity, is explained.
 
Discussion /Result
The results obtained from the above research can be summarized in the following axes:
 
Each religious authority has three components: science, present and action. The relationship between these three is one-sided and multilateral. The mechanism of the effect of each of these three things on the other is as follows. In the ascending arc, there is a movement from the side of action to the side of knowledge. Action by repetition creates the queen, and the queen causes the birth of knowledge. In the descending arc, science strengthens the properties and the properties produce a new action.
Each of the knowledge, conditions and actions are valid and reliable. Knowledge and knowledge are both the beginning of states and actions and the end of them. As science and knowledge are both subject and end.
Acts and acts of worship have both nonexistent and existential dignity. The lack of dignity of worship is related to the arc of the ascension, which causes the repetition of the deeds of the queens. Following the repetition of the action, the effect and state that arises in the soul, becomes solid and becomes a habit. The more the action is repeated, the more the current becomes the queen. Repetition of actions, in Sadra's eyes, removes obstacles and hijabs so that the soul can enjoy possessions; Therefore, repeating the actions is not from the appropriate Sunnah, but from the Sunnah of the removal of obstacles and hijab, which are non-existent matters. Also, when the soul reaches the level of possessing and being capable of possessing a conscience, it removes the veils of acquiring knowledge. Therefore, in Sadra's view, action is important due to the role it plays in self-fulfillment and knowledge acquisition, which is a secondary and transverse role.
Existential dignity of worship and actions finds its meaning in the arc of descent and movement from knowledge to states and then actions. In this movement, action is considered as the fruit of science, and knowledge is a prelude to action as required by science. With this knowledge, man performs worship and avoids sins.
Worships because of their role in reaching the knowledge of God. are ranked. Sins are also ranked due to the negative role they have in acquiring knowledge. Therefore, the greatest sin is to block the way to divine knowledge.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Bibliography:

     

    1. Ashtiani, Jalal al-Din, (1381), Commentary on Zad al-Masfar, Qom: Bostan Kitab (Islamic Propaganda Office Publications of Qom Seminary)
    2. Ermavi, Taj al-Din Muhammad bin Hossein, (Bi-Ta), al-Hashil fi al-Mashul, bi-ja.
    3. Akbarian, Reza (1389) The relationship between opinion and practice in Mulla Sadra's philosophy, Tehran: Khordnameh, Vol. 62, pp. 14-37.
    4. Razi, Fakhr al-Din, (1415), Mufatih al-Ghaib (Great Commentary), Beirut: Dar al-Fikr Publications.
    5. Zenozi, Ali bin Abdallah and Mohsen Kadivar, (1378), the collection of works of the founder Hakim Agha Ali Modares Tehrani, Tehran: Information Publications.
    6. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1360) A, Asrar al-Ayat, translator: Mohammad Khajawi, Tehran: Mouli Publications.
    7. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1366) A, Tafsir al-Qur'an al-Karim, Qom: Bidar Publications.
    8. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1981 AD), Al-Hikama al-Muttaaliyya fi al-Asfar al-Aqliyyah al-Fourth, Beirut: Dar Ihiya al-Trath al-Arabi.
    9. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1387), Three Philosophical Treatises, Qom: Publications of the Islamic Propaganda Office of Qom Seminary.
    10. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1366) B, Description of Usul Kafi, Tehran: Publications of the Institute of Cultural Studies and Research.
    11. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1360) B, al-Shawahed al-Rabubiyyah in al-Manahij al-Attawiyah, Tehran: Academic Publishing Center.
    12. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1381), Kesr Asnam al-Jahiliyyah, Tehran: Sadra Islamic Hikmat Foundation
    13. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Mohammad bin Ibrahim, (1354), Al-Mubadad and Al-Maad, Tehran: Iranian Society of Wisdom and Philosophy.
    14. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1420 AH), the treatise on the unity of the wise and reasonable in the collection of philosophical treatises of Sadr al-Mutalahin, Tehran: Hekmat Publications.
    15. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim, (1363), Mofatih al-Ghaib, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education, Islamic Society of Hikmat and Philosophy of Iran, Institute of Cultural Studies and Research.
    16. Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein, (1417 AH), Tafsir al-Mizan, Qom: Qom Seminary Society of Teachers, fifth edition.
    17. Mohagheq Damad, Seyed Mostafi (2019) Sharia secrets and benefits of obedience according to Sadra, Tehran: Khordnameh, Vol. 100, pp. 23-32.
    18. Mortazavi Babaheidari, Seyyed Rahman (2012) Philosophy of worship from Mullah Sadra's point of view, Maarif al-Aqli, 8th year, 2nd issue, serial 27, pp. 151-167.