Document Type : Biannual Journal

Authors

1 PhD student in Islamic Theology, Shahid Motahari University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Faculty of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Lorestan University.

Abstract

Banu Amin, who is a follower of MullaSadra's School of philosophy, has differences with her predecessors in some positions, such as the forces of the human Self, “Intellects Theory”, etc. Regarding the Intellects Theory, while criticizing the previous theories, she proposes the Theory of the Muhammadiyah's Spirit. The main question of the present research is the critical review of his encounter with the Intellects Theory and the evaluation of the Muhammadiyah's Spirit Theory. In his opinions, the Incorporeal of the First Intellect emphasized and she considers the First Intellect to have a delicate substance. Banu Amin answers the eight problems surrounding the Intellects Theory. Two problems are about the Incorporeal and Being of the intellect, five problems are about the corporeality of the intellect, and one problem is about the longitudinal order and the number of the Intellects. On the one hand, she considers rational reasons for Incorporeal of Intellects to be acceptable. On the other hand, she believes that considering the narrative evidences and the flaws of the rule of “Alvahed”, the corporeality of intellects not rejected in general. Therefore, in the end, she considers the corporeality of Intellects to be permissible and as the alternative Theory uses the Theory of Muhammadiyah's Spirit to explain the relationship between one and many. Sometimes she considers the Muhammadiyah's Spirit to be equivalent to the First Intellect, and sometimes considering the First Intellect to be corporeal and the Muhammadiyah's Spirit to be Incorporeal, she considers them to be differencing from each other. Therefore, Banu Amin criticizes the Theories that existed about Intellects until her time, and accepts and proves some parts of both Theories of Corporeal and Incorporeal of Intellects, and rejects some parts, and finally, expresses a new Theory about Intellects. In addition, in this regard even provides a new definition for the substance. Banu Amin is close to the mystics in the Muhammadiyah's Spirit Theory. Muhammadiyah's Spirit is the first issued from whom the First Intellect is issue, and the same characteristics that the philosophers have listed for the First Intellect; she counts for the Muhammadiyah's Spirit. Relying on narrative reasons and their preference and discussion from different points of view has created this new Theory in the opinions of Banu Amin. The present research method is analytical-critical.

Keywords

  1. Nahj Al-Balāgha

    1. Amin, Nusrat Begum. (1387). Nasimhaye Mehrabani: Tarjome va sharh Al-Nafaḥāt al-Raḥmānīyah fī al-Vāridāt al-Qalbīyah. Translation: Mehdi Iftikhar, Qom: Ayat Eshraq. [In Persian]
    2. Amin, Nusrat Begum. (1384). Sayr va Sulūk dar Ravish-i Awliyāʼ-i Allāh. Isfahan: Golbahar, first edition. [In Persian]
    3. Amin, Nusrat Begum. (1369). Maʿād, yā Ākharīn Sayr-i Bashar. Isfahan: Bahar. [In Persian]
    4. Amin, Nusrat Begum. (1328). Akhlāq va Rahi Sa‘adat: Iqtibas va tarjamih az Taharat al-Iraqi Ibn Maskuyih. Isfahan: Thaghafi. [In Persian]
    5. Amin, Nusrat Begum. (Beta). Tafsir Makhzan al-ʿirfān fi ʿulūm-i Qurʾān. Volume 2, 3, 4, 6, 13, Isfahan: Thaghafi. [In Persian]
    6. AveSinā, Hussein bin Abdullah. (1404). Al-Shefā, Volume 1, researched by Saeed Zaid, Qom: Marashi Najafi. [In Arabic]
    7. Helli, Hassan bin Yusuf. (1427). Al-Bābal-Hādi Ashr, Commentary by Fazel Meqdad Siori Helli, Isfahan: Islamic Publications Office. [In Arabic]
    8. Sadr al-Din Shirāzi, Muhammad bin Ibrā (1366). Shavāhed Alrabobieh. Translated and interpreted by Javād Mosleh, Tehran: Radio and Television of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]
    9. Sadr al-Din Shirāzi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim. (1384). Asfār Arba'eh, Volumes 3 and 5, translated by Mohammad Khājawi, Tehran: Molā. [In Persian]
    10. Sadr al-Din Shirāzi, Muhammad bin Ibrahim. (1387). Three philosophical treatises. Introduction by Seyed Jalāluddin Ashtiani, Qom: Islamic Propaganda Office. [In Persian]
    11. Tabātabāei, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein. (1427). Nahāiat Al-hekmat. Volume 1, 2, Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
    12. Majlesi, Mohammad Bā (1403). Bahār Al-Anwār. Volume 1, 15, 54, Beirut: Al-Wafa Institute. [In Arabic]
    13. Homāyouni, Alavieh. (1354). Tarjomeh al-Arbaʿīn al-Hāshimīyyah. Isfahan: Rabbani Printing House. [In Persian]
    14. Hosseini Sharif, Seyed Ali, and Gholam Ali Moghadam. 2015. "The First Creature in Hadiths and Two Different Encounters", Teachings of Islamic Philosophy, No. 18, pp. 77-101.
    15. Rezaei, Mohammad Jafar. 2014. "The evolution of the nature of reason in the first Imamia", Kalam Ahl al-Bayt, No. 1, pp. 22-5
    16. Saidimehr, Mohammad, and Farjipak, Mehdi. 2011. "Fakhr-e-Razi’s Criticism of peripatetics’ Theory of Intellectts", Javidan Khirad, No. 21, pp. 74-53
    17. Abdullahi, Mohammad Ismail. 1400. "The Holy Quran and how the world of plurality is related to the world of unity in the system of mystical ontology ", Hekmat-e Mo’aser, No. 12, pp. 331-358
    18. Mohammadi Mohammadieh, Zahra, and Javarshekian, Abbas. 2012. "A Comparative study of the Transmission from plurality to Oneness in Plato and MullaSadra’s ontology ", Hekmat-e Mo’aser, No. 4, pp. 119-99
    19. Panahizad, Hassan and Manani, Fereshte. 2017. "Islamic culture, the driver of the production of humanities in the anthropological thoughts of Bano Amin Esfahani", Andishe Novin Dini, No. 55, pp. 104-91
    20. AhleSarmedi, Nafiseh, and Eizadi, Maryamsaday. 2012. " Hakim Mudarres Zunuzi and Banu Amin on the Unity of Essence A Comparative study", Comparative Theology, No. 10, pp. 119-130