Contemporary Wisdom

Avicenna on the Pleasure of Works of Art and Its Relation to Perceptual Faculties

Document Type : Biannual Journal

Authors

Afra Khakzad 1
Hadi Rabiei 2
Mohammad Akvan 3

1 PhD student, Department of Philosophy of Art, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Art, Faculty member of University of Art, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author),

3 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Faculty member of Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30465/cw.2022.38376.1841
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Avicenna has discussed the pleasure of artistic and natural beauties in several of his works. Avicenna's views on the pleasure of artistic and natural beauties are often expressed under the more general concept of pleasure and are scattered in works with various subjects such as theological, logical, natural and mathematical works. He also discusses pleasure in relation to the perception and the perceptual faculties of the soul. In addition, an important and significant part of Avicenna's discussions about pleasure is devoted to pleasure of the arts, especially the representative arts.
Since the work of art is considered sensible, the question arises as to which perceptual faculties of man the pleasure of the work of art depends? Does the mere fact that a work of art is a sensible thing, means that the pleasure of a work of art is considered a sensible pleasure? Do other perceptual faculties, including the internal sensory faculties and the rational faculties, also contribute to the perception of the work of art, and does the pleasure of the work of art also depend on them? In the case of each of these faculties, including the external and internal sensory faculties and the rational faculty, the question can be asked how important and effective they are in perceiving the beauty of the work of art? In the present article, an attempt has been made to answer these questions from Avicenna's point of view.
 
Methods and Materials:
The research method of this article is fundamental. This research was conducted using a library research method, and the method of describing and analyzing information in this research is qualitative. The claim of this research is that according to Avicenna's views, the pleasure that is obtained from works of art, as a kind of sensible things, is not merely sensory pleasure and dependent on the five external sensory faculties.
Results and Discussions:
To examine this claim, the characteristics of aesthetic pleasure and its subjects as well as the epistemological status of this pleasure are studied and the pleasure of the arts of poetry, painting and music is explained from Avicenna's point of view. Finally, it is shown that the aesthetic pleasure of works of art is first of all a rational pleasure and depends on the faculty of reason and then, respectively, is an imaginary pleasure and depends on the faculty of imagination, and finally, is a sensible pleasure and depends on the perceptual faculties. Among the faculties of external perception, the faculties of sight and hearing have the greatest ability to obtain aesthetic pleasure from the arts, respectively.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study show that from Avicenna's point of view, each of the external and internal sensory faculties, and to a higher degree, the rational faculty, have their own aesthetic pleasure. External sensory faculties, namely sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch, each have limitations. In this way they can only enjoy what they can comprehend. But the range of pleasure of the internal faculties is much greater than the pleasures of the external faculties. Because all the sensory forms perceived by the external perceptual faculties are grouped together and interconnected, there is more pleasure for the internal faculties. This is why the imaginative faculty enjoys the perception of images preserved in the imagination. For example, the imagination, by preserving and storing sensible auditory forms of musical notes, makes it possible that the audience's pleasure is not limited to single notes and sound type, but can understand the sequence of musical notes and enjoy them. Ultimately, it is the faculty of reason that in the strict sense of the word can enjoy the pleasure of perceiving beauty. Because from Avicenna's point of view, beauty lies in features such as proportion, composition and symmetry, and although the audience first perceives data from a sensible object through sensory perception, but the perception of features such as proportion is specific to reason. Accordingly, aesthetic pleasure is at its highest dependent on rational perception.
According to Avicenna, irrational pleasure is a pleasure that is aroused, but without thought and reflection, and is appropriate to nature and the senses, but hearing and sight give pleasures to the soul that are not merely by nature, but are rational, because they refer to nonsensible meanings, for example, when one sees a beautiful work of art, one is drawn to it and tends to liken it.
The results of this study show that according to Avicenna, since the external and internal senses present the works of art to the human intellect and the intellect recognizes their beauty, the perception of beauty encompasses all levels of human cognitive faculties. Also, since aesthetic pleasure follows the perception of beauty, the perception of beauty produces different levels of pleasure, at least as much as it involves perceptual levels.

Keywords

Aesthetic pleasure
Avicenna
Work of Art
Beauty
Imagination
Imitation

Subjects

Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1363 B), Treatise on the Medicine of the Heart in Avicenna's Medical Writings, The Study and Research of Muhammad Zuhair al-Baba, Damascus: The Institute of Arab Heritage.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1363a), The Beginning and the Resurrection, Edited by Abdullah Nourani, Tehran: Institute of Islamic Studies, McGill University in collaboration with the University of Tehran.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1949), Al-Adhawīya fī ‎Amr Al-Ma'ad, Suleiman Dunya, Egypt: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1954), Rhetorics from the Book of Healing, Edited by Ibrahim Madkour, Cairo: Al-Amiriya Press.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1960), Theology from the Book of Healing, Edited by Ibrahim Madkour, Cairo: Al-Amiriya Press.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1966), Poetics from the Book of Healing, Edited by Abdul-Rahman Badawi, Cairo: Al-Amiriya Press.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1973), A Treatise on Ascension, Rasht: Orwat Al-Wothqa.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1979), Love in the Treatises of Avicenna, Qom: Bidar.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1984a), Salvation from Drowning in the Sea of ​​Misguidance, Edited by Mohammad Taghi Daneshpajooh, Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1984B), Music from the Book of Healing, Edited and referenced by Ahmad Fouad Al-Ahwani and Mahmoud Ahmad Al-Hafni, Qom: The Ministry of Education.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (1996), The Soul of the Book of Healing, Research by Hassan Hassanzadeh Amoli, Qom: Maktab al-A'lam al-Islami.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (2004A), Remarks and Admonitions, Volume 3, Qom: al-Balaqah.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (2004B), Theology of Dānishnāma-yi ʻAlāʼī, Second Edition, Hamedan: Bu Ali Sina University.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (2004C), Treatise of the Soul, Edited by Mohammad Moein, Second Edition, Hamadan: Bu Ali Sina University.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (2004D), Natural Sciences of Dānishnāma-yi ʻAlāʼī, Second Edition, Hamedan: Bu Ali Sina University.
Avicenna, Husain Ibn Abdullah (2005), Al-Qanon, Beirut: Dar Al-Ehya Al-Torath Al-Arabi.
Bahrami, Mehdi (2020a), " The Concept of Beauty According to the Avicenna's Thoughts Based on The Studies of Pleasure ", Avicennian Philosophy (Meshkaat Al - Noor), 24(64).
Bahrami, Mehdi (2020b), "Analysis of the Relationship Between the Perfection of Perceived Object and the Perception of Pleasure in the Thought of Ibn Sina", Ontological Researches, 9(17).
Bahrami, Mehdi, Nasrollah Hekmat, and Seyed Razi Mousavi Gilani (2020), "The Review and Criticism of the Interpretation of Khaje Nasir Al-Tosi for “ Neil” about Pleasure in Avicenna' s Al-Isharat wa' l-Tanbihat", Knowledge, 13(1).
Elahi Khorasani, Nafiseh, Morteza Hosaini Shahroodi, and Abbas Javareshkian (2019), "A Study of Mulla Sadra's Perspective of the Imaginative Pleasure", Philosophy and Kalam, 52(1).
Ganjipour, Zahra, Farajullah Barati, and Meysam Amani (2021), "The Relationship between Pleasure and Happiness from the Point of View of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra", Philosophical Researches, 15(35).
Gheibi, Vali (2011), "The Relationship between" Pleasure and Happiness "from the Perspective of Epicurus and Sadr al-Mutallehin", Qabasat, 16(60).
Ghorbani,Hashem and Abolhassani Niaraki, Fereshteh (2015), "A Comprehensive Analysis of the Concept of Felicity and its relationship with Perfection and Pleasure in Tusi's View", Metaphysics, 7(20).
Khademi, Einollah (2010), " An Inquiry on the Nature of Pleasure in Avicenna's Point of View", Philosophy and Kalam, 43(1).
Khademi, Einollah (2013), "What and Types of Pleasure from Suhrawardi's Perspective", Philosophical Theological Research, 14(3&4).
Khademi, Einollah (2014), " The Quiddity of Enjoyment in the Meskavayh's View", Knowledge, 7(2).
Khademi, Einollah and Morteza Hamedi (2011), "Eschatological Pleasure and Pain in Avicennian Philosophy", Ayeneh Marefat, 9(28).
Levinson, Jerrold (1996), The Pleasures of Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Maftouni, Nadia and Mahmoud Nouri (2018), "A Comparative Study on Farabi and Avicenna's Viewpoints about the Ultimate Goal of Art and The Role of Entertainment, Wonder and Pleasure", Avicennian Philosophy (Meshkaat Al - Noor), 22(59).
Miri, Seyed Javad, Seyed Mohamad Javad Banisaeed Langaroudi, and AmirAbbas Alizamani (2019), "A Comparative Study of Pleasure in Aquinas and Mulla Sadraa’s theories of Happiness", Existence and Knowledge, 6(12).
Mohammadi Monfared, Behrooz, Zahra Abbassipur, and Mohammad Hassan Mahdipur (2019), "Revision of the Reality of Pleasure in Avicenna’s and Sadra’s Ethical Thoughts", Research Quarterly in Islamic Ethics, 12(43).
Moorer, Armand E. (2013), Philosophy of Beauty: A Thomistic Interpretation, translated by Hadi Rabiei, Tehran: Hekmat.
Omranian, Seyedeh Narjes (2019), Pleasure and meaning of life; A comparative study of Aristotle, Ibn Sina, and Bentham, Tehran: Moula.
Omranian, Seyedeh Narjes and Amir Abbas Alizamani (2017), "Pleasure and The Meaning of Life According to Ibn Sina's Viewpoint ", Avicennian Philosophy (Meshkaat Al - Noor), 21(57).
Pikave, Martin (2018), Pleasure, New York: United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Rabiei, Hadi and Mitra Ghaffari (2015), "Avicenna's Views on "Mohakat" in Painting", Contemporary Wisdom, 9(1).
Shojaee Baghini, Hoorieh, and Einollah Khademi (2020), "Investigating Pleasure Quiddity through Components and the Position of its Design in the Avicenna Philosophy", Wisdom and Philosophy, 16(64).
Shojaee Baghini, Hoorieh, Einollah Khademi, Abdollah Salavati (2020), "A Comparative Study of the Views of Al-Shaykh Al-Raʾīs and Shaykh Al-Ishraq On the Quiddity Of Pleasure", Avicennian Philosophy (Meshkaat Al - Noor), 24(63).
Soleimani, Fatemeh (2010), "Pleasure and Pain from Ibn Sina's View", Avicennian Philosophy (Meshkaat Al - Noor), p. 14, p. 44(44).

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us