A Study of the Distribution of Human Provision (Rizq) According to Avicenna’s Philosophy, Particularly the “Essay on Provisions”

Soleimani, Fateme

doi:10.30465/cw.2021.7269

A Study of the Distribution of Human Provision (Rizq) According to Avicenna’s Philosophy, Particularly the “Essay on Provisions”

Document Type : Biannual Journal

Author

fateme soleimani

Associate Prorfessor , Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30465/cw.2021.7269

Abstract

Introduction
God as the creator and lord of humans, and as All-Provider (razzāq), is in charge of providing for human primary basic needs, as in the Qur’an God promises to make basic provisions for everyone. The promise led some people to think that humans have a right to receive provisions from God, expecting that God should optimally and fully provide for human needs. For this reason, the difference in people’s provisions has led to questions concerning divine justice.
The problem with which this paper is concerned is why God has allotted different amounts of provisions to different people, instead of giving different people equal shares of provisions. Moreover, if allotment of provisions is attributed to God, why is it emphasized that people try hard to gain provisions?
These questions have frequently been raised in religious milieus throughout the history, often with the intention of casting doubts on religious beliefs by questioning divine justice, since different provisions for different people are thought to be at odds with God’s justice.
A number of papers in the field of Quranic sciences have been written about this problem, which are based on the views of Quranic exegetes, on which we draw in this paper. The contribution of this paper is that it offers a philosophical consideration of the problem in terms of Avicenna’s philosophy, particularly his essay on provisions (Risāla fi-l-arzāq). It is noteworthy that the problem was not tackled by any other Muslim philosophers. In Islamic philosophy, God’s attribute of All-Provider is mentioned in passing as an attribute of action—it is at most defined and reduced to divine attributes of essence such as knowledge, wisdom, and power. Avicenna deals with the problem of provisions in his Risāla fi-l-arzāq. This is an essay attributed to Avicenna. Over 20 manuscripts of the essay are available in libraries, and its attribution to Avicenna has not been a matter of dispute.
The essay is concerned with questions about divine justice and how to treat people’s differences in their provisions in these terms. Avicenna explicitly deals with the problem in terms of a debate. In line with his Peripatetic framework, he considers different aspects and possible results of the question, as illustrated with numerous examples.
In this paper, I provide an account of Avicenna’s remarks here given his general theoretical framework as explicated in other works of his. I also offer criticisms of his account. Taking account of the views of Quranic exegetes concerning the problem, I offer my own account of the problem.
Discussion and Conclusions
In order to reconcile two groups of Quranic verses in one of which the allotment of provisions is attributed to God and in the other the attainment of provisions is conditioned upon the human labor and efforts, one might offer the following account: in a monotheistic view, provisions are ultimately allotted and distributed by God, but this is in terms of unchanging traditions in accordance to the divine wisdom. In the best or optimal order and the dynamics of the universe, human wills and the amount and quality of their labors and efforts play roles in the expansion or diminution of one’s provisions. For obtaining a desirable provision, a set of conditions should be satisfied and certain grounds should be prepared.
Given one’s material and spiritual possessions, which are in turn from God, every person tries to obtain provisions by drawing upon one’s insight, intelligence, as well as spiritual and material capitals. The better one performs in utilizing one’s opportunities the more provisions one attains, and the more negligent and indolent one is in using one’s existential and material capacities and the more vulnerable one makes oneself to unpredictable economic circumstances the more deprived one will be and the more futile one’s efforts will turn out to be, in which case one will have a diminished provision. In this way, God the Wise has established laws and traditions in the creation in such a way that everyone can attain his or her own share of provisions with their mental and physical capacities, without there being any injustice.
In his “Essay on provisions” Avicenna has dealt with the problem of the difference in people’s provisions and its bearing upon the divine justice. In this essay, he tries to rely on divine wisdom and grace to correct wrong conceptions and establish divine justice in the measurement of people’s provisions. Through an articulation of the contradictions involved in different aspects of the problem, Avicenna shows that the idea of exactly equal provisions leads to an impossibility or the human destruction.

Keywords

provision (rizq)

expansion of provisions

divine justice

divine grace

Avicenna

Risāla fi-l-arzāq (Essay on provisions)

The Qur’an

Ibn Khaldūn, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Muḥammad. N.d. Muqaddima Ibn Khaldūn (Ibn Khaldūn’s Introduction). Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi. [In Arabic]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn ‘Abd Allāh. 1375. Al-ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt (Remarks and Admonitions). Translated by Ḥasan Malikshāhī. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn ‘Abd Allāh. 1319. Tadbīr manzil (Household management). Translated by Muḥammad Najafī Zanjānī. Tehran: Ibn Sina Bookstor. [In Persian]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn ‘Abd Allāh. 1389. “Risāla fi-l-arzāq” (Essay on provisions). Edited by Najafqulī Ḥabībī. Jāvīdān Khirad 4: 87-101. [In Arabic]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn ‘Abd Allāh. 1387. Ṭabī‘iyyāt Shifā’ (Natural sciences from the book of healing). Translated and interpreted by Muḥammad Ḥusayn Nā’ījī. Qom: Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute. [In Persian]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn ‘Abd Allāh. 1363. Mabda’ wa ma‘ād (The origin and the resurrection). Tehran and Montreal: University of Tehran and McGill University. [In Arabic]

Ibn Sīnā, Ḥusayn ibn ‘Abd Allāh. 1388. Majmū‘a rasā’il, risāla ‘arshiyya (Collected essays, the throne essay). Edited by Maḥmūd Ṭāhirī, and translated by Ḍiyā’ al-Dīn Durrī. Qom: Ayat-i Ishraq. [In Persian]

Ale Rasul, Susan, and Bordabord Parvin. 2013. “Tawsi’i va Qabz-i Rizq va Ruzi az Manzar-i Qur’an-i Karim [Enrichment and Curtailment of Livelihood from the Viewpoint of the Holy Qur’an].” Majalli-yi Qur’ani-yi Kawsar [The Koranic Journal of Kawsar] no. 47. [in Farsi]

Bihishtī, Aḥmad. 1385. Tajrīd: sharḥ namaṭ-i haftum az kitāb al-ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt Ibn Sīnā (Abstraction: commentary on the seventh part of Avicenna’s Remarks and admonitions). Qom: Bustan-i Kitab. [In Persian]

Jadidi, Ahmad. 2011. “Rizq va Ruzi dar Qur’an-i Karim [Livelihood in the Holy Qur’an].” Majalli-yi Pazhuhishnami-yi Qur’ani [Journal of Koranic Research] no. 5. [in Farsi]

Jurjānī, Ḥusayn ibn Ḥasan. 1377. Al-ta‘rīfāt (The definitions). Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Arabic]

Jawharī, Ismā‘īl ibn ‘Imād. 1407. Al-ṣiḥāḥ tāj al-lugha wa ṣiḥāḥ al-‘arabiyya (The crown of the language and the correct Arabic). Beirut: Dar al-‘Ilm al-Madayin. [In Arabic]

Ḥabībī, Najafqulī. 1389. “Muqaddima risāla fi-l-arzāq” (Introduction to the essay on provisions). Jāvīdan Khirad 4: 87-101. [In Persian]

Khaṭīb Baghdādī, Aḥmad ibn ‘Alī. N.d. Tārīkh Baghdādī aw madīnat al-salām (History of Baghdadi or the city of peace). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya. [In Arabi]

Dihkhudā, ‘Alī Akbar. 1373. Lughatnāmih-yi dihkhudā (Dihkhudā dictionary). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]

Rāghib Iṣfahānī, Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad. 1381. Mufradāt alfāẓ al-Qur’ān (Single terms of the Qur’an). Damascus and Beirut: Dar al-Ta‘allum and Dar al-Shamiyya. [In Arabic]

Zuḥaylī, Wahba. 1424. Al-tafsīr al-munīr fi-l-‘aqīda wa-l-sharī‘a wa-l-manhaj (The illuminating exegesis on the belief and the law and the way). Damascus: Dar al-Fikr. [In Arabic]

Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd ibn ‘Umar. 1407. Inkishāf ‘an ḥaqā’iq ghawāmiḍ al-tanzīl wa ‘uyūn al-aqāwīl fī wujūh al-ta’wīl (Unveiling the realities of the obscurities of the revelation and the sources of remarks in aspects of interpretation). Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-‘Arabi. [In Arabic]

Sayyid Quṭb Shādhlī, Sayyid ibn Ibrāhīm. 1412. Fī ẓilāl al-Qur’ān (In the shadows of the Qur’an). Beirut and Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq. [In Arabic]

Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. 1419. Al-ḥikmat al-muta‘āliya fi-l-asfār al-arba‘a (The transcendent wisdom in the four journeys). Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabiyya. [In Arabic]

Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī, Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm. 1383. Sharḥ uṣūl al-kāfī (Exposition of the principles of the sufficient). Tehran: Institute for Human Sciences and Cultural Studies. [In Arabic]

Ṭabāṭabā’ī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn. 1389. Al-mīzān fī tafsīr al-Qur’ān (The scale in the exegesis of the Qur’ān). Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyya. [In Arabic]

Ṭabarsī, Aḥmad ibn ‘Alī. 1413. Al-iḥtijāj (The argument). Qom: Uswa. [In Arabic]

Ṭabarsī, Faḍl ibn Ḥasan. 1412. Majma‘ al-bayān fī tafsīr al-Qur’ān (Compendium of words in the exegesis of the Qur’an). Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi. [In Arabic]

Ṭurayḥī, Fakhr al-Dīn. 1375. Majma‘ al-baḥrayn wa maṭla‘ al-nyyirayn (The mingling of the two oceans and the rise of the two lights). Tehran: Murtazawi. [In Arabic]

‘Abdullāhīpūr, Mahdī, and Muḥammad ‘Alī Mahdawīrād. 1391. “Ḥikmat-i gūnigūnigī-yi rūzī-hā az dīdgāh-i Qur’ān” (The wisdom behind the variability of provisions in the Qur’an). Andīshih-yi Nuvīn-i Dīnī 8, 29: 53-68. [In Arabic]

Abdullahipur, Ahmad. 2012. “Falsafi-yi Takafful-i Ruzi-ha az janib-i Khudavand dar Qur’an [The Philosophy of the Guarantee of Sustenance from God in the Qur’an].” Majalli-yi Qabasat [Qabasat: A Quarterly Journal on the Philosophy of Religion] no. 63. [in Farsi]

Fulad, Mohammad, and Fari Arani, Somayyeh. 2015. “Bazkavi-yi Avamil-i Tawsi-i-yi Rizq dar Islam [A Re-Analysis of the Factors in Enrichment of Livelihood in Islam].” Majalli-yi Ma’rifat [Journal of Ma’rifat] no. 212. [in Farsi]

Fīrūzābādī, Muḥammad ibn Ya‘qūb. 1407. Al-qāmūs al-muḥīṭ (The surrounding ocean). Beirut: Mu’assisat al-Risala. [In Arabic]

Muṭahharī, Murtaḍā. 1376. Dars-hāyi ilāhiyyāt-i shifā’ (Lectures in the theology of the book of healing). Tehran: Hekmat. [In Persian]

Muṣṭafawī, Ḥasan. 1368. Al-taḥqīq fī kalimāt al-Qur’ān al-karīm (Research in the words of the noble Qur’an). Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. [In Arabic]

Hemmati, Mohammadali, and Keshavarzi Vafadari Hosseinabadi, Marziyeh. 2020. “Barrasi-yi Avamil-i Qabz va Bast-i Rizq va Ruzi dar Qur’an va Ahdayn [A Study of the Factors in Curtailment and Enrichment of Livelihood in the Qur’an and Old and New Testaments].” Majalli-yi Mutali’at-i Qur’ani [Journal of Qur’anic Studies] no. 44. [in Farsi]