عنوان مقاله [English]
Wise Sabzevari, who is one of the advocates of the issue of unity of subject and object, in addition to describing the arguments of Sadr al-Muta'lehīn, has put forward some arguments in support of this issue. In this research, the three arguments of matter and form; sensible immaterial; and transformation of derivative to origin , which are based on his original arguments, have been criticized and evaluated formally and materially.
The argument of matter and form is confiscated to principii petito, in which the claim principle is taken in the argument. The sensible immaterial argument, is misleading and fundamentally void, because in the third premise, there is a great confusion between the first carriage and the rushing carriage.
In the third argument, the wise and sensible conversion to intellect does not mean that they will be united. Therefore, none of the three arguments are sufficient to prove unify of subject and object and reasonable, and does not have the ability to prove the claim.
The formulation of arguments and criticisms is all new and the result of the writers' reflections