<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>IHCS</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Contemporary Wisdom</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2383-0689</Issn>
				<Volume></Volume>
				<Issue>Articles in Press</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A survey of Mosame&#039;te argument</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A survey of Mosame&#039;te argument</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2520</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30465/cw.2017.2520</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kohansal</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty Member</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahzad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hejazi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The Argument of Mosame&#039;te is one of argumens used for proving finitude of dimensions, that is so hard just like other infinity-related topics. Some of philosophers like Khaje deny to accept this argument, and some like Mullasadra accept it. This argument is based on crossing of two infinite lines, losing this crossing causes denying of infinite dimension. Foundation of refusing this argument is that we can refuse such point of crossing or due to the nature of infinite dimension. In this research we claim that the argument is acceptable, but due to curvature of space, we can not prove finitude of dimensions with this argument.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The Argument of Mosame&#039;te is one of argumens used for proving finitude of dimensions, that is so hard just like other infinity-related topics. Some of philosophers like Khaje deny to accept this argument, and some like Mullasadra accept it. This argument is based on crossing of two infinite lines, losing this crossing causes denying of infinite dimension. Foundation of refusing this argument is that we can refuse such point of crossing or due to the nature of infinite dimension. In this research we claim that the argument is acceptable, but due to curvature of space, we can not prove finitude of dimensions with this argument.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mosamete Argument</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">angle</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Aan (moment)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Time</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">crossing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">parallelism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
